Application Of Industrialised Building System Construction Essay

Application Of Industrialised Building System Construction Essay This is because under the Seventh Malaysia Plan (1996-2000) the Government of Malaysia for the first time to introduced the Low Medium Cost Housing category (the previously it was classified together with medium cost housing category) due to the always increasing demand for housing in this category. In additional, it is to ensure that the middle low income group with salary ranging from RM1,501.00 to RM2,500.00 per month and able to own a house. However, the pricing of low medium cost housing are around RM42,001.00 to RM60,000.00 per unit only. Using IBS in this types of housing project are more suitable because high volume and stability of demand for buildings is the advantages of using IBS. Besides that, it will also reduce the selling price of low medium cost housing. The IBS is a manufactured the building components at factories (off site manufacture), will enable cost saving; safety and health; productivity and quality improvement through the reduction of labour intensity and construction standardisation. Apart from this method, it also offers minimal site wastage, less site materials, cleaner and neater environment, controlled quality, and lower total construction costs. Using higher percentage of IBS in the construction of public housing and other building projects will provide better productivity, quality, and safety, especially for the total construction time saving and cost saving. IBS will contribute towards a better construction industry, as well as improve the global competitiveness of Malaysian builders. Nowadays, IBS in Malaysia become more popularity in the construction industry especially for the Government project. An early effort by the Government of Malaysia to promote usage of IBS and develop an Open Building system (OBS) concept as an alternative to conventional and labour intensive construction method has yet to make headway. According to Works Minister Datuk Mohd Zin Mohamed, the prefabricated parts will be used in all Government projects in a proposal to reduce the dependence on foreign workers. Besides that, it wills also reducing inherent social problems involving these foreign workers. The use of prefabricated parts was part of the IBS which would be adopted for all Government projects. The Government of Malaysia has ordered all government agencies carrying out development and peopleà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s housing projects to use at least 70% IBS content in those projects. In the beginning, literature review was conducted to determine an overall idea regarding IBS for public housing. This refers to collecting the latest secondary data and information from different sources which including books, journals, magazines, dissertations, conference papers, and information from the internet. These materials were used for background reading to obtain full understanding and information needed for discussion and analysis in the research. Conventional construction method is defined as components of the building that are prefabricated on site through the processes of timber or plywood formwork installation, steel reinforcement, and cast in-situ. This construction method is mostly built of reinforced concrete frames for conventional building. Using the wooden formwork mainly is for the traditional construction method and need take some time to construct the formwork before concreting. This construction method is much more costly for construction which is need includes total labour requirement, raw material, transportation and very importance once is low speed of construction. The main objective of a cast in-situ construction method is to weed out and reduce the using traditional timber formwork, brickwork, and plastering. A carefully planned in-situ work can maximise the productivity, speed and accuracy of prefabricated construction. Cast in-situ method uses lightweight prefabricated formwork made of steel or fibreglass or aluminium that is easily erected and dismantled. The steel reinforcement is placed within the formwork after finishes construct the formwork. After placing the reinforcement they are being erected and concrete is poured into the mould. When the concrete is set and according to the required strength, the moulds are dismantled. The workers can be easily trained to erect the moulds and set the steel reinforcement. These construction methods are required limited labour and it will reduce the total labour need. Its advantages over the conventional construction method include, low skill workers requirement, speedy construction, low building m aintenance, durable structure and less construction cost. These prefabricated timber framing systems is using the timber in the construction industry for construct the building. Usually the timber framing system are consists of timber building frames and timber roof trusses (show as below figure 7). While the steel framing systems have been the more popular choice on construction industry, but the timber roof truss system also have its own market where it is offering interesting designs from simple dwelling units to buildings requiring high aesthetical values such as chalets for resorts. This prefabricated timber framing system we can see in the traditional building. Prefabricated construction in Malaysia started way back almost fourth years ago with the completion of the Tunku Abdul Rahman Public Housing Estate or commonly known as the Pekeliling Flats. No proper plan was formulated by the government for the industrialisation of construction and until the inception of the IBS Roadmap 2003-2010. This is a master plan to facilitate the transformation the Malaysian construction sector was formulated with inputs from industry and endorsed by the Cabinet back in October 2003. Known as the à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Industrialised Building System (IBS) Roadmap 2003-2010à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ , the master plan is based on the 5-M Strategy (Manpower, Materials-Components-Machines, Management-Processes-Methods, Monetary economic and financial and Marketing promotion) with the aim of having an industrialised construction industry as well as achieving Open Building by the year 2010. The transformation of the construction sector is crucial in ensuring the successful achieveme nt of Vision 2020. Each part on the IBS Scoring was having their own rules and regulation to calculate the points. For example: under Part (1): Structural System, the points are awarded for various types of structural system used such as precast concrete beams and columns, steel, and prefabricated timber. For the Part (2): Wall Systems, the points are awarded based on various types of wall systems used such as precast concrete panel, glass, dry partition and block work. For the Part (3): Other Simplified Construction Solutions, the points are awarded based on usage of other simplified construction solution for example standard components based on MS 1064, standardized grids, other 3D prefabricated components (prefabricated toilets, and staircases). IBS Score calculation only considers the superstructure elements of a building and sub-structure works are not taken into account in the calculation.

Case Study Questions Essay

1. What are the inputs, process, and outputs of UPS’s package tracking system? 2. What technologies are used by UPS? How are these technologies related to UPS’s business strategy? 3. What strategic business objectives do UPS’s information systems address? 4. What would happen if UPS’s information systems were not available? Answer: 1. A. Inputs * Package Information * Customer Information * Destination * Current Location of the parcels B. Process * The data are transmitted to a central computer and stored for retrieval. Data are also organized so that they can be tracked by customer. C. Output * Smart Labels * Signatures of Receiver * Proof of delivery * Receipts 2. Technologies used by UPS * DIAD (Delivery Information Acquisition Device) * Barcode scanning systems * Smart Labels * Wired and Wireless Communication Network (GPRS, CDMA) * Desktop and Central Storage â€Å"Best Services and Lowest Rates† Because of the advance integration of UPS’s technology. It can provide services cheaper and more efficiently. That technology solves problems like logistics and supply chain management, freight forwarding, customs brokerage, mail services. 3. Strategic Business Objectives of UPS’s information systems address * Operational Excellence UPS manage to cut down costs and save M 28 Miles by their truck using advanced technology. * New Products, Services and Business Models The information systems of UPS created new way on how to offer delivery service. It has transformed the way the company gathers information, creating routes etc. * Competitive Advantage UPS had already its operational excellence and New Products, Services and Business Models which means the UPS already gain a competitive advantage. Having this kind of technologies that they use like DIAD made them do things better than their competitors. 4. If UPS’s Information Systems were not available: * Operational costs could be higher. * Millions of gallons of fuel could be burnt. * Millions of miles could be driven. * UPS’s would not be able to track their parcels and deliver them efficiently if these systems were not available. MIS in Action

Contemporary Issues in Buddhism - 2302 Words

Contemporary Issues in Buddhism Team D REL/133 May 21, 2013 Prof. Joseph Pirelli Buddhism is considered one of the oldest forms of religion dating back over 2,500 years; which originated in Thailand and has spread throughout Asia and begun to spread in Northern America, with over 125 million practicing Buddhists today. Siddhartha Gautama the founder of Buddhism became Buddha, his teachings and philosophy of selflessness and love towards others, modest and meek lifestyle, karma and reincarnation, education, and total submission and control of the mind and body are the basics of this religion. Buddhism has similar characteristics with other major religions that include practices, rituals,†¦show more content†¦Islam like Buddhism believes in eternal life and the concept of the universe, Buddhism believes that the universe is separate from God even though it was created by God. Islam also believes the same way about the universe. Both Islam and Buddhism believe in humanity and in not worshiping idols, Islam imposes a taboo on this practice. Buddhism believ es in the essence of Dharma and as Islam condemns idol worship. Both believe in equality and appose evil, creed and stresses equality, Buddhism does not have the concept of a Godly figures yet Islam believe in a God name Allah. Both believe in salvation and the concept of the world, Islam has the Holy Quran and follows its teaching and avoids the hells mentioned in the Holy Quran. The interactions between the modern world Buddhism are different they have ways about them that’s very similar. Buddhism is becoming a worldwide religion you can find Buddhist temples and meditation can be found in all part of the world. They really focus on the essential teaching their emphasis awareness and insight. Buddhist wants their people to be aware of what goes on in the world and have an eye for everything. Have self-reliance and taking things up on yourself because the members to take responsibly for constantly practicing his or hers faith in the religion. Have insight for Buddhist are being well around people having views that fit modern science and its nonviolence way and civilized behavior in a world withShow MoreRelatedDalai Lama Essay777 Words   |  4 PagesQuestion 1- Buddhism (20 marks) The significant people and schools of thought in Buddhism that have the most impact are those that challenge adherents to follow Buddhist teachings more closely. How accurate is this statement in relation to ONE significant person or school of thought, other than the Buddha. The fourteenth Dalai Lama, also known as the Bodhisattva of Compassion, is one of the most significant religious leaders in the world and is also exceptionally important to Buddhism. He hasRead MoreThe Growth Of Technology And Consumerism1528 Words   |  7 Pagestheft, and breaking and entering all to obtain material items. According the Won-Buddhism website â€Å"in contemporary society, where material civilization is rapidly advancing and dominates people s minds, materialism and consumerism make people driven, competitive and nervous.† Through background research and my experience of Won-Buddhism, I have found that Won-Buddhism helps participants cope with this contemporary world. The Fourfold Grace reminds individuals of their indebtedness to their parentsRead MoreCurrent Issues Paper and Class Handout861 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿CURRENT ISSUES PAPER 1 Buddhism REL/133 Week 5 Elton Shaw March 17, 2015 Instructor: Susan Cameron CURRENT ISSUES PAPER 2 Intro As one of the most popular religions in the entire world, Buddism is believed to be originated by SiddhatthaRead MoreAnnotated Bibliography Of Buddhist Ethics Online1669 Words   |  7 PagesPrebish, Charles S., and Damien Keown. Buddhism the Ebook : An Online Introduction. 4th ed. State College: Journal of Buddhist Ethics Online, 2010. PDF. , $27.75, ISBN 978-0-9801633-6-0 Background Information Charles S. Prebish was Professor Emeritus of Religious Studies at Pennsylvania State University from 1971 to 2006. Upon retiring from Pennsylvania State University, he served as the first holder of the Charles Redd Endowed Chair in Religious Studies at Utah State University where he also servedRead MorePhl/215 Philosophy Matrix988 Words   |  4 PagesUniversity of Phoenix Material Philosophy Matrix   Ã‚  Field |   Ã‚  Definition | Historical Developments  Ã‚   |   Ã‚  Schools Of Thought |   Ã‚  Key Contributors  Ã‚  Ã‚   |   Ã‚  Principal Issues | Epistemology | The study of knowledge: What constitutes knowledge, the nature of knowledge, and whether knowledge is possible | Pre-Socratics observe and seek to define physical phenomena.Socrates studied human behavior and tried to determine the essential nature of knowledge.AristotleRead MoreChina And Jap Spirituality, Belief And Faith Are Personal1271 Words   |  6 Pagesas well as sacred places. There exist numerous distinct religions internationally whereby 84% of the world population is associated with one of the major religions including Hinduism, Islam, Buddhism, and Christianity. Japan and China have undergone different changes that have seen the revival of contemporary Religious life. A comparison can be made between the two countries in a cultural and historical context. This paper will explain these contexts and reveal the binding and distinguishing factorsRead MoreTheravada Buddhism and Escaping Rebirth Essay1192 Words   |  5 Pageswhich, enlightenment comes in the form of eternal afterlife in a superior setting with the higher power. Buddhism however, reaches enlightenment or also known as Nirvana by escaping the cycle of rebirth. Buddhism has been around as a religion for quite some time now an in today’s society it may seem too be viewed a bit different but still the main principles it was founded on still stand. Buddhism gets more in detail and specific if it is being observed to that extent, into three branches also knownRead MoreThe Mahayana Buddhist Tradition And The Teachings Of The Bodhisattva1604 Words   |  7 Pagesinto our contemporary view of moral practice. Apart from Buddhist traditions, more contemporary moral theories draw out ideal approaches towards altruistic acts. When speaking of a person performing such acts, we might consider them a ‘do-gooder’, similarly a more controversial do-gooder takes morality to an extreme extent that might be considered ‘saintly’ (in either a secular or non-s ecular way). What I want to focus on in this paper is the notion of moral theory in Mahayana Buddhism and, in particularRead MoreA Relationship Between Monastics And Lay Followers1699 Words   |  7 Pagessomeone who isn’t completely devoted to Buddhism because they aren’t living the monastic lifestyle, obeying all the strict rules set forth in the Sekhiya Dhamma, such as â€Å"with downcast eye will I take a seat amidst the houses† and â€Å"not with too large balls will I make (up my food)†¦Ã¢â‚¬  but the Sangha would not thrive without the vital help of lay followers who provide food and resources that monks need to even obey these rules as well as function and practice Buddhism. Even though lay followers are notRead MoreComparing The Religions Of Hinduism And Buddhism Essay1459 Words   |  6 PagesExam II #2. Compare and contrast the religions of Hinduism and Buddhism. What were the essential differences between the two? What hope did they give to the common people of India ? Both Hinduism and Buddhism are prominent religions in the ancient and modern world. They are arguably two of the most popular polytheistic faiths as well. Most people make the mistake of grouping them as one uniform religion, but this is inaccurate. Buddhism and Hinduism do split some resemblance, but several aspects

Using Class Material Newspapers Finance Essay - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 13 Words: 3986 Downloads: 5 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Finance Essay Type Narrative essay Did you like this example? Using class material, newspapers, academic articles and government/specialized reports, compare the US corporate governance system with the French system of corporate governance and explain the key differences and common points you identify. As we wish to compare the American and French model of Corporate Governance, we will do so by stating common points or differences following the 8 main points of Corporate Governance. They are the following: forms of organizations in the country, shareholders rights, stakeholders rights, management structure, the role of directors, employees, the government and finally, the corporate social responsibility. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Using Class Material Newspapers Finance Essay" essay for you Create order Form of Organizations: In France, there are a great number of private companies; most often owned by families since generations and generations; for example Hermà ¨s. These types of corporations (private) generally do not sell their stocks, which stay in the same family. However, shareholders in these companies have the same characteristics as in another type of organization. The most numerous form of business in the United States is the model of sole proprietorship (75%) (and partnership represent 8% of all businesses). They are mainly small enterprises and are the easiest ways to start a business in the United States. The other dominant model is the corporation one (20% of businesse). Although they are fewer in number, they represent an important share of the countrys aggregate business receipts (86.5% of business sales). Indeed, many of the largest businesses in the US are public companies; such examples include Microsoft or General Motors Company. These public companies ge nerally have numerous shareholders, who sell and buy shares on the stock market. Shareholders rights and roles: In France, companies shareholders have an important role. The Winter report (2002), aimed at modernizing and tightening corporate law as well as corporate governance through 10 priorities including a set of rules about shareholders rights. The law on new economic regulations of 2001, following existing guidance of best practice wanted to increase the rights of minority shareholders. (Charreaux, Wirtz, 2007). Another major point of this law was to ensure a transparency towards shareholders. In France we can state 3 main rights which are; the right to vote at general meetings, the right to dividends and finally, the right of balance-adjustment in case the company would go bankrupt. In North America, we can identify 6 shareholders main rights. They have the voting power on major issues like the election of directors or major changes for a company like a merger or an acq uisition. One of their rights is the ownership of a portion of the company; indeed, by buying stock, they own something which has value. They also have the right to transfer ownership by trading their stock on the market. They are entitled to the companys dividends (in the case profits are not reinvested in the firm to increase its value). Being a shareholder also means they are allowed to see books and records of the company. This is not a problem for public companies, which have the obligation to make their financial situation public but it can be more delicate for private ones. Shareholders also have the right to sue the company in case of a wrongful act (an example of this kind a lawsuit was in 2002 with the WorldCom scandal, when the company largely overstated its earnings, thus hiding the reality from shareholders). Stakeholders rights and roles: Stakeholders are generally investors in a company, whose actions can have an impact on the companys decisions. They generally meet at the board of directors where they have the right and responsibility to agree or not with a decision for the company or introduce a new one. They have the right to appoint anyone to senior management or get someone to leave the company if necessary. Apart from the board of directors, they can also get involved directly with the company by taking over departments and taking decisions directly. In the United States, their protection is generally ensured thanks to contracts and strict regulations. In France, and since the Winter report followed by new laws, everyone orbiting around the company has increased rights and security. An employee can become a stakeholder and participate in its management better than before. Management structure: France is one in a few countries letting companies have the choice between a one- and two-tier structure. Some companies have a one-tier structure, where the board of directors makes important business decisions concerning the company. Ot her companies have a two-tier structure. This structure means having two boards of directors, the first one (management board) supervises the company and gives general guidelines while de second one (supervisory board) oversees major decisions for the company. The second board is appointed half by shareholders and half by employees. This second board elects the management board. In the United States however, companies have a unitary board of directors with a combined chief executive officer (CEO) and chairman. The unitary board is usually composed of no less than 3 people and up to 24 people. They elect the single PDG, who will be both CEO and chairperson. Employees: Various corporate governance codes have been drawn up by the employers associations (MEDEF and AFEP) under the names of the Vià ©not 1 2 reports and the Bouton report (Charreaux, Wirtz, 2007). Employees in France benefit from a good protection thanks to the numerous unions. They put a lot of pressure on compa nies and the government to improve their situations. They enable employees to have a say and protection even if they are not part of the union. In the United States, the interests of workers are defined through contracts and regulations from the government. Unlike in France, employees do not have any voice in a companys corporate governance (OConnor, 2000). The only link they have to the company is through pension funds, which are important shareholders of companies in the U.S. Pension funds as investment in a corporation is a voice for employees. Roles of directors: The principal conclusions of Mace (1971) were that directors serve as a source of advice and counsel, serve as some sort of discipline, and act in crisis situations. They are also accountable for the strategy of the company. In the United States, just like in France, directors have to be loyal and act honestly, in the best interests of their company. Their mission is to maximize shareholders wealth. France has als o developed a complex system of cross-shareholding where the director of a company attends another companys board. Government: In the United States, the government only provides the regulatory framework, leaving the actors on the market fight it out; the winner take all criteria (Mendez, 2004). They have information control, asking companies to be more transparent to the public. They also have monopoly control with antitrust laws to prevent any excess of power or monopoly. France seems to have more protectionist policies and is also much more involved with national companies with interventionist policies. Corporate social responsibility: Around the world, we have witnessed a growing concern for corporate social responsibility. A study comparing CSR between US and EU (Maignan, Ralston, 2002) showed that one difference was that US businesses mentioned more often their involvement in CSR than French ones. Also, the study showed that US companies did this as an extension of their core values while French corporations did this for customers and national regulations. This brings us to an important difference; French public corporations have the obligation to be responsible (socially) and to publish a report annually. This was introduced in 2010 via the Grenelle Law II. The study (Maignan, Ralston, 2002) also showed that US corporations seem to commit to CSR to look good and add value, not to do something good. Conclusion: Overall, we can say that Corporate Governance is quite different in the United States and France. There are similarities in the players roles however they differ when it comes to employee protection and role with numerous unions in France unlike in America. Both governments have policies to protect all actors and have similarities in the management structure (depending on the French companies choice). To conclude, it is safe to say that both countries Corporate Governances have more or less the same values and goals. Essay 2: Effective corporate governance the chairman and CEO of an organization need to carry out their functions effectively. Please explain (a) what are the respective role and functions of the Chairman and the CEO and (b) what are the advantages and disadvantages of allowing one individual to act as both chairman of the board and chief executive officer of a quoted company. We will now focus on the actual governance of a corporation through two major roles: CEO and Chairman. We will do so and start by explaining the role and functions of both the chairman and the CEO. We can find a lot of literature on the actual role of a CEO. One author (Mintzberg, 1998) decided to run an intensive five weeks of observation in 5 American firms (middle- to large-sized). Unlike previous authors, he did more than just ask top executives to write diaries about their daily activities but spent a lot of time with these 5 CEOs and exchanged mails afterwards to make sure his report was accurate. From this r esearch, Mintzberg developed a framework composed of 10 basic roles of a top executive, which can be subdivided into 3 smaller groups: interpersonal roles, information-process activities and decision-making activities. The first CEOs interpersonal role is the role of Figurehead. Indeed, a CEO is a person put in charge of handling social, legal and ceremonial affairs. Usually, they must attend and lead formal dinners, welcome and take care of important business visitors, agree to and sign various contracts. Then, there is the Leader role as he needs to stay in touch with his subordinates to keep them trained and motivated but most importantly, he must fulfill the needs of the company through the actions of the subordinates. Finally, the Liaison role is more external to the company. Indeed, the chief executive must keep cordial relationships with his network of top executives and other important people. These networks are essential in business and consist of exchanges of informatio n and benefits. When it comes to the CEOs information-process, we can identify 3 main roles performed before processing the information. The first one is the role of Monitor, as the CEO sends and receives a lot of information, coming from various sources. The information he seeks is about the surroundings of the company, to better understand the milieu his company is evolving in. This information generally comes from outside the company thanks to his network (part of his Liaison role). This brings us to the Disseminator role, which is when the CEO shares the right and chosen information with subordinates and the Spokesman role, where the CEO shares the information with outsiders and keep them informed on how the company is doing or what she is doing. The last set of roles concerns decision-making activities. The first role is the one of Entrepreneur as he is the one who takes the responsibility of making changes to the company. The second role is the Disturbance handler where the CEO has to take actions if the company is facing a crisis or disturbance. The resource allocator role explains itself; the CEO is responsible for deciding who has what in the firm and so on. Finally, as a negotiator, the manager is often required during important or critical negotiations. Indeed, he is the one with the power but most importantly, he has all the information. What we can say is that the role and functions of a CEO are very complex and diversified. He must be everywhere at anytime and his actions are critical to a companys situation. We will continue our work by observing the role and functions of a chairman. In a company, the chairman is appointed by the board and his most important role is to make sure of the effectiveness of the board in setting up strategies. The chairman has various tasks; the first one is to lead the board. Moreover, he is responsible for the composition and development of the board. As the boards leader, he must give the right infor mation to the boards members and lead their meetings in an efficient way. He has the responsibility to plan them and involve all members in the work. Finally, he has the role of supporting the CEO. Outside of the board and outside of the company, the chairman also has the function of communicating the companys goals and policies to outsiders. Now that we have defined the role and functions of the CEO and chairman, we will discuss the combined position of CEO and Chairman in a company. Indeed, the role of chairman can be combined with that of a CEO, most often in smaller companies (Institute of Directors, 2010). More importantly, we will focus on the advantages and disadvantages of this concept in a quoted company. Brickley, Coles and Jarrell (1997) recently studied this situation and what it entailed for companies. They came up with several conclusions which will help us determine advantages and disadvantages of combining roles in a company. Even though it seems logical to hav e two different people doing two different roles, there are a few advantages having the two functions combined. Brickley, Coles and Jarrell (1997) argue that a company can save costs linked to separating the two roles. These are agency costs of making sure the chairman acts in the right way towards the company and board. Moreover, combining the roles can give the CEO a different perspective, maybe better, wider or newer thanks to the multiple roles and functions. Furthermore, When a CEO is also a chairman it permits him to have a global vision of the company strategy. Indeed, in a lot of cases, the chairman aims to have good results in the short term in order to impact directly the price of the stock of the company and its image, and to increase the dividends of the people of the board and of the investors. These results at short term are very important for the company but it is also really important to consider the strategy of the company in long term. Indeed, the strategi c choices for the company like buying assets or invest in Merger or acquisition for example are often made in order to optimize the result and benefits in long term and have often a bad influence on the price stock at short term and sometimes on the companys image. However it is crucial for the company to take decisions like that in order to ensure the durability of the companys activity. These decisions are taken by the CEO of the company. This example shows well that it is really important to take decision in favor of the well-being of the company in long term and in short term. Thats why having a CEO who is also a Chairman permits to equilibrate the strategic decision in favor of the investors and of the activity of the company. Moreover, it is really good for the company to have a CEO Chairman because he can understand the different axes in the measurability of the performance of the company and try to take good decisions to maximize the global result by trying to satisfy eve ryone. Also, in case of a meeting of the board the important shareholders will more be able to trust the CEO chairman if he explicates that the objectives of the company are not focused on the stock price but on the revenue of the company in long term, than if he was only the Chairman. Finally, the fact of having a Chairman who is also a CEO permit to keep a strong link between the company and the investors, what can be considered as better for the company. Many authors recommend that these roles should be separated. The Working Group stated that having 2 different people would increase accountability and ensure that the interests of the shareholders as a whole were given due weight (Ford, 1997). Moreover, the combination of the two roles could be a source of conflict because of the concentration of power. If we believe some of Corporate Governances basic principles, there would be conflicts of interests between the CEO position and the chairman position. Indeed, CEOs ha ve specific obligations towards the company and have to protect their own situation while the chairmans position has to participate actively in making a collective decision with the board (keeping the whole companys interest in mind). And the board might have to make the decision by assessing critically the CEOs performance, his choices, etc. The board needs to be able to speak freely in order to be efficient and transparent with one another. This would be difficult if the CEO was sitting at the same table during a meeting. If the chairman is the CEO, then he might not make the objective and right decision, if he wants to protect his own interests as the CEO. Moreover, there is a difference between both positions goals. Indeed, the chairman has quite short-term goals, which are linked to stock prices and shareholders while the CEO has longer-term goals, linked to the companys situation, strategy, future. The problem if both roles where held by only one person would be the difficu lty of making decisions with two different interests. Also, because only one person would have the roles of acting, reporting information and taking decisions, this would leave very little transparency towards the board or the company. Indeed, the CEOs actions could be invisible to the board and this could actually lead to bigger problems like corruption or other public scandals. Separating the two roles would enable the chairman to monitor the CEOs actions and thus protect stockholders interests. Even though there might be advantages to having only one CEO/chairman, it seems legitimate that the two roles should be separated as the chairman and CEO can both concentrate on different (but equally important) aspects of the company. Also, it seems that the demands from shareholders to split both roles are more and more numerous; big companies like Wells Fargo or News Corp. are faced with shareholders demanding that they appoint an independent director instead of their CEO in the r ole of chairman (Semadeni Krause, 2012) Essay 3: In the 1990s, the stock options plans for top managers were seen by many as a relevant instrument for aligning interests of shareholder and management, thus solving many corporate governance issues. Please explain and justify why we could now consider that this hope has failed. An employee stock plan occurs when a person from a company holds shares from this same corporation. Stock option plans started their exponential growth in the 1990s when new technologies firms launched these plans to attract but also retain potential or current employees. Before, stock options were only granted to CEOs and other directors from outside the company. Today, they have become a good way to compensate employees in various industries. Overall, managers believe that being a shareholder would increase loyalty and better performances however, the subject is now highly controversial and we can say this hope has not lived up to managers expectations. Let us start by defining these stock option pla ns (or SOPs). An SOP occurs when a firm releases a certain number of shares to its employees at a fixed price and this for a limited time frame. Usually, this price (or strike price) equals the market value of the given stock at the time. Employees have to wait for the maturity of this option (generally four years) to buy shares. If the stocks market value has increased during the four years, then employees are able to buy shares at an important discount. Once these employees own stocks, they can choose to keep them or sell them on the stock market. This brings us to our controversy on stock option plans, and how they do not live up to firms expectations as they enable employees to become shareholders. The first criticism one could easily make about stock option plans is about the loyalty of the employees. Indeed, it seems that once the new owners of options have waited for the maturity of their options, they tend to cash in their options immediately. There are a few reasons f or this; first, employees may wish to diversify the options they hold, which means they will sell their companys options to get shares from another (maybe faster-growing) company. Second, some employees might simply want or need the extra money and just retrieve their new gains. We could thus say that stock option plans do not always increase employee loyalty, or if it does, only until their stock options reach maturity. The second criticism involves the hope of stock option plans to increase employees performances. We can see why the management would think holding shares would encourage employees to work even better in order to increase the value of the firm on the market. However, experience has shown that these plans increase the risks taken by management. Stock option plans have a specificity that regular shareholding does not have. Indeed, stock option owners can decide whether or not to exercise their options to buy. This means that they only share the success part of ownin g shares, they are not affected if the market price decreases, unlike regular shareholders. Another criticism about stock option plans is that it can put the company at a certain risk. Indeed, it seems that if a large number of employees decided to exercise their options to buy at the same time (if the market price is favorable for example), then the companys structure would be at risk. When employees decide to exercise their options, the firm must, on the other hand, re-issue shares and if the number of new shares is too important, then the value of the remaining stocks is decreased. The most dangerous aspect is that once a company offers stock option plans, it cannot control the day when employees will decide to exercise their options, most importantly, it is highly likely to happen in the same period of time if the market is favorable for stock options. Finally, if we look at a concrete example of failures with stock option plans we can see they can lead to many problems. L et us look at the Enron scandal of 2001 for example. Enron was an American energy company based in Texas. Enrons stocks began to increase thanks to diversification of the company with electricity plants, paper plants or water plants, pipelines, and even broadband services around the world. At the same time, new executives used financial loopholes to hide the companys debts (billions of dollars). Employee or executive stock option plans were widely used in Enron (just like in the rest of the country) and they were making a lot of money, not knowing about the real financial crisis of the company. The real problem was that people within the company were obsessively thinking about short-term earnings, which is not a way to run a company. Moreover, there were problems with the management, who had sold hundreds of millions worth of stock just before the crisis. We can say that stock option plans have multiple risks, either linked to management or employees, and that the downfall may be fa st and brutal. We have witnessed a number of scandals similar to the Enron case like Tyco or WorldCom among others. Overall, it seems that as far as stock option plans are concerned, disadvantages tend to outweigh the advantages for companies. However, Gilles (1999) suggested various possible alternatives to these problems. Some of which include the use of premium-price options, which makes an option worth nothing unless the firm improves its performance by setting the exercise price higher than the market price when the option is released by the company. Another given solution is companies giving and setting guidelines to management, requiring them to keep a certain number of stock options to be eligible for future stock options Collier-Hillstrom (2012).